Recent Posts
1
Bug Reports & Feature Requests / Re: [Feature Request] SSL
« Last post by MrJones on August 22, 2010, 12:12:40 am »Due to some unexpected incidents 
I happen to have SSL almost done in the socket code now.
SSL will be available in 0.8.5 (next release)!
I happen to have SSL almost done in the socket code now.SSL will be available in 0.8.5 (next release)!
2
Bug Reports & Feature Requests / Re: [Feature Request] BotServ
« Last post by Dexxa on August 19, 2010, 03:24:56 pm »I've found a bot 
seems to look ok
if anyone is looking for one check out http://pmcchp.com/chainsaw/index.html
or winbot
seems to look ok if anyone is looking for one check out http://pmcchp.com/chainsaw/index.html
or winbot
3
Bug Reports & Feature Requests / Re: [Feature Request] BotServ
« Last post by Dexxa on August 19, 2010, 12:56:12 am »Bots kick bad chatters out, say if someone swears the bot kicks them out for you if no host is in the room
Chanserv doesnt kick the users out tho?
Never used pircbot, not that smart doing stuff like that but i'll give it a try
Chanserv doesnt kick the users out tho?
Never used pircbot, not that smart doing stuff like that but i'll give it a try
4
Support / Re: Chanserv
« Last post by Dexxa on August 19, 2010, 12:50:37 am »Thank you,
seemed to have done the trick
seemed to have done the trick
5
Bug Reports & Feature Requests / Re: [Feature Request] SSL
« Last post by MrJones on June 22, 2010, 11:02:45 pm »This surely needs to be done but I'm still working on plain server linking (that seems more important to me). And no doubt server linking will still take some months to be fully worked out since I'm working alone on it.
So SSL could still take a year or so until I get around to start with integrating it to be frank, and especially since openssl seems complicated to me and I'd need to look into some other projects/IRCds and how they do it before I could come up with own code, there's also going to be a need for a considerable amount of research and time once work starts.
Conclusion: It will be worked on some day, but that day might be somewhere in 2011 or so and then it will take again some research and work until it finally works [that probably translates to request accepted but sadly postponed for now]
Since server linking is TS6-based it *might* be possible to link a Charybdis IRCd as SSL gateway once linking works. But that's a bit far-fetched now, just an idea. We will see. (and the server links themselves would be still plain text then)
So SSL could still take a year or so until I get around to start with integrating it to be frank, and especially since openssl seems complicated to me and I'd need to look into some other projects/IRCds and how they do it before I could come up with own code, there's also going to be a need for a considerable amount of research and time once work starts.
Conclusion: It will be worked on some day, but that day might be somewhere in 2011 or so and then it will take again some research and work until it finally works [that probably translates to request accepted but sadly postponed for now]
Since server linking is TS6-based it *might* be possible to link a Charybdis IRCd as SSL gateway once linking works. But that's a bit far-fetched now, just an idea. We will see. (and the server links themselves would be still plain text then)
6
Bug Reports & Feature Requests / [Feature Request] SSL
« Last post by strang0r on June 21, 2010, 06:22:11 pm »hey,
is there anything planned to include ssl so you can connect to the network via a secure connection?
greetz,
strang0r
is there anything planned to include ssl so you can connect to the network via a secure connection?
greetz,
strang0r
7
Bug Reports & Feature Requests / Re: [Feature Request] BotServ
« Last post by MrJones on June 05, 2010, 01:06:42 am »I have to admit I never used BotServ. Therefore I don't know what it is for. I imagine you can create custom channel bots with it - but whatelse would they do what ChanServ doesn't do already (except useless additional fantasy commands like !cola or things like that)?
If someone could outline some functionality such BotServ-created bots could provide I might think about adding it (given I agree on that functionality being useful).
If someone could outline some functionality such BotServ-created bots could provide I might think about adding it (given I agree on that functionality being useful).
8
Support / Re: Can Flood Protection be disabled?
« Last post by PeekopAndropov on June 04, 2010, 04:35:28 pm »Perfect
Thanks.
Thanks.
9
Support / Re: Can Flood Protection be disabled?
« Last post by MrJones on June 04, 2010, 03:10:26 pm »Add a new oper account for your IRC bot. Then make sure to add "NoFlood" to the "Flags" line of the oper account.
If your bot will now login using that oper account, it can set "MODE <ownnickname> +F" to deactivate flood control for itself (and only for itself, not server-wide for all users) completely. Also for being able to op people in channels and the like you should probably have your bot use an oper account.
Please note that +F only deactivates the flood control for stuff your bot sends to the server, the send queue for data the server sends to your bot (other way round) can still possibly exceed if you request the server to send you an awful lot of things.
If your bot will now login using that oper account, it can set "MODE <ownnickname> +F" to deactivate flood control for itself (and only for itself, not server-wide for all users) completely. Also for being able to op people in channels and the like you should probably have your bot use an oper account.
Please note that +F only deactivates the flood control for stuff your bot sends to the server, the send queue for data the server sends to your bot (other way round) can still possibly exceed if you request the server to send you an awful lot of things.
10
Support / Can Flood Protection be disabled?
« Last post by PeekopAndropov on June 04, 2010, 07:38:15 am »Hey again...
I've decided to put the service thing on hold for a bit and I've moved on to developing a channel bot that's a little more robust than the included ChanServ and NickServ. They are good, but I wanted a bot that could be a little intuitive.
The trouble that I'm running into is when you query it for commands while it's connected, the server kicks it for Excessive Flood even with the Flood Protection set to soft.
Is there away to disable the flood protection all together in the Windows version?
I've decided to put the service thing on hold for a bit and I've moved on to developing a channel bot that's a little more robust than the included ChanServ and NickServ. They are good, but I wanted a bot that could be a little intuitive.
The trouble that I'm running into is when you query it for commands while it's connected, the server kicks it for Excessive Flood even with the Flood Protection set to soft.
Is there away to disable the flood protection all together in the Windows version?